What is a Crime?
There are many answers to the question ‘what is a crime?’ No act is a crime until it is recognised as such by society and written into the states’ and federal criminal legislation. To a practicing lawyer, a crime is anything prohibited under criminal law – the criminal law being that branch of law dealing with state punishment.
An act is a crime only if the government defines it as one. Certain acts we may think of as always being crimes in all places, however that is not the case.
The criminal law contains both fault based crimes and strict liability offences.
A legal prohibition is a criminal prohibition when it is subject to criminal proceedings. Criminal proceedings differ from civil proceedings.
Criminal proceedings are characterised by such things as the kinds of bodies which have jurisdiction over the matter (courts), the manner in which proceedings can be commenced (charge) and the rules of evidence (standard of proof).
Criminal Liability
This concept refer to responsibility for a crime and the penalty that the state imposes for it.
A person can be found to be criminally liable if the prosecution were to prove that the person committed the criminal act and also had the required criminal intent.
In all Australian jurisdictions the age of criminal liability is 10. There is a rebuttable presumption that a child between the ages of 10 and 14 lacks the capacity to be held criminal responsible. This is referred to as the presumption of doli incapax (‘incapable of crime’).
Mens Rea or Criminal Intent
Mens Rea refers to criminal intent. The translation from Latin is “guilty mind”. A mens rea refers to the state of mind statutorily required in order to convict a particular defendant of a particular crime. The mens rea is required to prove guilt in criminal proceedings.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offence with that culpable state of mind. If a statute specifies explicitly a mental state, then the court will usually apply the requisite mental state to each element of the crime. Even if the legislation were not to mention a mental state, the courts will usually require that the prosecution still prove that the defendant possessed a guilty state of mind when committing the offence.
How is ‘mens rea’ established?
In Kural v The Queen, the High Court stated:
“Because the mental elements in different crimes vary widely it is impossible to make a statement which is universally valid for all purposes about the essential elements of a guilty mind. Depending upon the nature of the particular offence the requirement of a guilty mind may involve intention, foresight, knowledge or awareness with respect to some act, circumstance or consequence. Where the offence charged is the commission of a proscribed act, a guilty mind exists when an intention on the part of the accused to do the proscribed act is shown. The problem then is one of proof. How does one prove the existence of the requisite intention? Sometimes there is direct evidence in the form of an admission by the accused that he intended his conduct to involve the forbidden act. More often, the existence of the requisite intention is a matter of inference from what the accused has actually done. The intention may be inferred from the doing of the proscribed act and the circumstances in which it was done.”
Categories of Mens Rea
Mens rea is divided into three categories: general intent, specific intent, recklessness/criminal negligence. Additionally, there is a class of crimes for which no mens rea element is required. These are called strict liability crimes. Strict liability crimes are crimes for which liability is imposed without consideration of the defendant’s knowledge or intentions.
General intent crimes require that the defendant had the intention to commit an illegal act. All that is needed for a conviction is an intent to commit the act that constitutes the crime.
Specific intent designates a special mental element that is above and beyond any mental state required with respect to the actus reus of the crime. Specific intent is a term used to describe a state of mind that exists where a defendant objectively desired a specific result to follow his act. The prosecution must prove that the defendant acted with the intent to achieve a specific goal, as well as the intent to commit the illegal acts. Specific intent cannot be inferred from the commission of the act and specific proof is required to demonstrate that this element is satisfied.
Strict liability crimes, also known as public welfare offenses, are crimes that do not require mens rea. The prosecution need only prove the person engaged in certain conduct. The rationale for strict liability crimes is that certain acts justify imposing criminal liability regardless of intent. The most well known example are traffic laws.
Criminal Lawyers
Lamont Law specialise in criminal law.
If you have been charged with a criminal offence, you need expert legal advice.
Call us anytime on 1300 365 075 to book a free initial consultation.
Our lawyers have a proven track record of excellence.
Contact Us
Why Choose Lamont Law
-
Excellent Record of Success
Our lawyers at Lamont Law specialise in criminal law and we will expertly guide you through the criminal justice system. We will ensure that you receive the strongest representation and we are determined to protect your rights. Our lawyers have a proven track record of excellence.
-
Highest Level of Service
We pride ourselves on providing expert legal advice and the highest level of service. All of our staff members are exceptionally friendly. You will be consulted consistently throughout the process and we will answer any and all of the legal questions which you may have. Our experienced team of criminal and traffic defence lawyers regularly appear in Local and District Courts across New South Wales in a variety of different matters. We have a high level of success rate and hundreds of positive online reviews.
-
Local Professionals in your Community
Our lawyers appear in court everyday. We are familiar with local court magistrates. We know how to prepare your matter to obtain the best possible outcome.
-
All Courts
Our experienced team of criminal and traffic defence lawyers regularly appear in Local and District Courts across New South Wales.
-
Flexible Initial Conference Options
We provide flexible conference options over the phone, video or in person at our office locations across Sydney, the Hunter Region, the North Coast and the Central Coast.
-
Flexible Payment Options
We provide affordable fixed fees and payment plans for several kinds of matters. Call us now for a free and no obligation discussion.