Our client was a 20-year-old male charged with ‘use carriage service to menace/harass’ and ‘assault occasioning actual bodily harm’. The complainant was his former partner of three years.

The police case was, after enjoying a night out at Honeysuckle the two caught an uber to the complainant’s home in New Lambton. The complainant alleged that our client had taken her phone in the Uber and this resulted in argument between them. She told police on body-worn camera that they exited the uber and continued to argue at which time our client had pushed her to the ground multiple times causing her to hit her head and resulting in several lacerations to her elbows, knees and hands. She was taken to hospital and over the course of an hour our client had sent her 30 text messages. He was charged with the offences and pleaded not guilty.
At the hearing, Skye put our client’s version to the complainant in cross-examination. She was challenged about the cause of her injuries which, on the defence case, occurred as a result of her intoxication. She denied this.
At the conclusion of the hearing the court indicated its intention to find our client not guilty in respect of the assault offence, but adjourned the matter for further legal argument with respect to the use carriage offence.
Skye and Tristan Appleton worked together preparing a compelling legal argument and ultimately our client was acquitted of all charges.

Result achieved by

Skye Nixon

Solicitor · Lamont Law

Skye is admitted to the Supreme Court of NSW and the High Court of Australia since 2021. She graduated from University of New England and is currently undertaking her Masters in Forensic Mental Health at the University of New South Wales. Skye is a member of the New South Wales Law Society, as well as a member of Legal Aid NSW Private Lawyer panel.

Other Results

Skye Nixon

@Maitland Local Court

Discharged without Conviction – Contravene ADVO | Common Assault | Stalk/Intimidate with Intent Maitland Local Court

Our client was a 20 year-old male charged with domestic violence related offences involving his father at their home. Our client was arrested and taken into custody, with the family arranging for our solicitor Skye to arrive at Maitland Police Station shortly after.

Through a well-considered release application, our client was granted conditional bail upon a plea of guilty to 3 of the 5 charged offences. The matter was adjourned for hearing on the defended charges. At the hearing, two offences were withdrawn and dismissed. Skye was able to persuade the court to apply for the full utilitarian discount, and made compelling submissions on sentence. Ultimately, the charges were dismissed subject to the condition our client be of good behaviour for twelve (12) months. There was no conviction, and no penalty. Our client expressed his sincerest gratitude for having avoided a criminal record, with just one week to go in his education before progressing to work-placement.

Skye Nixon

@Newcastle Local Court

Not Guilty - Assault ABH | Stalk/Intimidate with Inten

Our client was a 57-year-old male charged with domestic violence related offences involving his older brother, following an argument which turned physical in their home. During the altercation, the victim was left with serious injuries requiring brief hospitalisation. Their mother was also left slightly bruised and battered in attempting to intervene, and our client too had a number of injuries. Whilst being transported to hospital, the complainant gave a self-serving version of events to emergency responders who swiftly notified police. Once again, the complainant gave a statement to police that was implausibly one sided and our client was charged with the offences. At the hearing, the complainant gave evidence that our client was so out control on the date in question he had no doubt he was fighting for his life. After a well-planned and thorough cross-examination, our client was found not guilty.

Skye Nixon

@Gosford Local Court

Discharged without Conviction – Common Assault | Stalk/Intimidate with Intent Gosford Local Court

Our client, charged with domestic violence related offences following an argument at his home with his adult daughter, initially pleaded not guilty on advice from another lawyer. Just weeks out from the hearing, he contacted Lamont Law for a free consultation to seek out a second opinion. His concern was, the incident was fully captured on video and the evidence was expected to be played in Court.

Our solicitor Skye spoke with the client on several occasions, taking the time to explain the available options and the consequences of each. Ultimately, our client instructed us to resolve the proceedings by way of charge negotiations.

At the hearing, with the complainant present, Police accepted the defence offer and in doing so reinstated our client’s sentencing discount. After preparing for sentence, we were able to persuade the court to deal with the matters by way of Conditional Release Order without Conviction for a period of six (6) months. Our client was overjoyed by the outcome and to have avoided a criminal record.

Skye Nixon

@Singleton Local Court

Not Guilty - Assault ABH

Our client was a 39-year-old female who was charged with DV related ‘assault occasioning actual bodily harm’ of her former partner. The Facts as alleged by the complainant, is that whilst he was driving he assaulted with our client allegedly having punched him several times; and bit him to the centre of his back leaving a nasty bruise. Our client was arrested and taken into custody. She was subject to strict bail conditions, as well as an ADVO which prevented her from returning to her workplace where the complainant was also employed. Our solicitor Skye came into the matter a week prior to first mention. She immediately sought a variation of the ADVO and bail conditions to allow our client to return to work. A plea of not guilty was entered. At the hearing, Skye cross-examined the complainant meticulously and at the close of the evidence, the Local Court Magistrate declined to hear submissions from the parties. The learned Magistrate remarked he could not possibly accept the complainant’s version, with so many of the defence questions being answered with ‘I don’t know/I don’t remember’ and so many inconsistencies he could not explain. Our client was found not guilty.