@Wyong Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend, a Commonwealth offence commonly involving text messages, phone calls, emails, or social media communications.
This offence is treated seriously and carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. A conviction can also have significant consequences for employment, reputation, and future opportunities.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska carefully reviewed the evidence, advised the client on available options, and prepared persuasive material focusing on rehabilitation, personal circumstances, and future prospects.
Appearing on the client’s behalf, Kristina Batkovska made strong submissions seeking leniency and a non-conviction outcome.
The Court dealt with the matter by way of a Conditional Release Order without conviction.
As a result, no conviction was recorded.
Why this result matters: Commonwealth offences can have serious consequences. Avoiding a conviction can be critical for a client’s future.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@ Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with steal from a dwelling house, a serious dishonesty offence under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). This offence carries a maximum penalty of 7 years imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness with which the law treats theft committed inside a person’s home.
Allegations of stealing from a dwelling house can have lasting consequences. A conviction for dishonesty can affect employment opportunities, professional licences, visa applications, travel prospects, and personal reputation. For many clients, avoiding a criminal record is critically important.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska carefully reviewed the prosecution material, obtained detailed instructions from the client, and prepared strong subjective evidence for the Court. This included material directed to the client’s background, remorse, insight, and future prospects.
Kristina Batkovska then made detailed submissions seeking leniency and urging the Court to deal with the matter without recording a conviction.
After considering all of the circumstances, the Court imposed a Conditional Release Order without conviction.
As a result, no conviction was recorded, allowing the client to move forward without the burden of a criminal record.
Why this result matters: Dishonesty offences can carry serious long-term consequences. Strong preparation and effective advocacy can make a substantial difference to the final outcome.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Hornsby Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court facing charges of intentionally or recklessly destroy or damage property, negligent driving, and fail to give particulars to another driver arising from a road incident on the Pacific Highway.
Police alleged that after an earlier collision and verbal exchange, our client intentionally followed another motorist before striking the side mirror of the other vehicle as he rode past on his motorbike.
The allegations were serious because, if accepted, they suggested deliberate retaliation and intimidation. This would have increased the objective seriousness of the matter and potentially affected the penalty imposed by the Court.
Our client was 37 years old, married, the father of a one-year-old daughter, with no criminal antecedents and only a limited traffic history. His primary concern was avoiding a licence disqualification, which would have significantly impacted his family and daily responsibilities.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska reviewed the charge papers, obtained detailed instructions, and identified that the police facts did not fully reflect the circumstances.
Kristina Batkovska then secured dashcam footage from the officer in charge and sent detailed representations seeking amendment of the facts. Those representations were accepted, establishing that after the initial argument the parties had coincidentally come across each other again, rather than the client intentionally pursuing the other driver.
This significantly reduced the client’s moral culpability and changed the way the matter was viewed by the Court.
As a result, the Court imposed a Conditional Release Order without conviction for 12 months on the destroy/damage property offence.
For the negligent driving and fail to give particulars offences, convictions were recorded with a $520 fine, however no licence disqualification was imposed.
Why this result matters: By carefully reviewing the evidence and successfully negotiating amended facts, the most serious aspects of the prosecution case were reduced. This allowed the client to avoid a conviction for the property damage offence and keep his licence.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Windsor Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with driving with an illicit drug present in oral fluid, blood or urine after police alleged he was stopped for exceeding the speed limit and subsequently returned positive indications for cocaine and cannabis.
Police also alleged a reading of 0.049 for alcohol, resulting in an immediate suspension relating to the drink driving matter, while the drug driving offence proceeded to Court.
Drug driving offences can result in criminal findings, fines, and licence disqualification. For this client, the consequences were particularly serious. He was only 18 years old, had no criminal antecedents, limited traffic history, and was working while also enrolled in a TAFE course.
The client’s cannabis use was connected to an undiagnosed back condition, later suspected to involve autoimmune arthritis. His existing licence suspension had already made travelling to work and TAFE significantly more difficult. Any further disqualification or conviction would have created major obstacles at an important stage of his life.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska reviewed the charge papers, obtained detailed instructions from the client, and advised on the subjective material required to present the strongest possible case.
Appearing on the client’s behalf, Kristina Batkovska made submissions emphasising the client’s youth, employment, ongoing studies, medical circumstances, and the disproportionate hardship that a conviction or further disqualification would cause.
After considering the evidence and submissions, the Court dealt with the matter by way of a Conditional Release Order without conviction for 9 months with standard conditions.
As a result, no conviction was recorded, and no additional disqualification was imposed.
Why this result matters: For young clients, avoiding a conviction and further licence loss can be critical to education, employment, and long-term opportunities. Careful preparation and strong advocacy can make a significant difference.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Hornsby Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with driving with an illicit drug present in oral fluid, blood or urine after police alleged he was stopped for a random breath test and returned a positive indication for cannabis.
Police did not allege any poor manner of driving or dangerous conduct. However, aggravating circumstances included that the client was driving on a learner licence and had two passengers in the vehicle at the time.
Drug driving offences are treated seriously in New South Wales and can result in fines, licence consequences, and criminal findings. For this client, the matter carried particular significance as he was only 17 years old, had not yet finished high school, and was at the beginning of his adult life.
The client had no criminal antecedents, limited traffic history, and one prior infringement for driving unsupervised.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska reviewed the charge papers, carefully conferenced with the client to obtain full instructions, and advised on the subjective material required to present the strongest possible case to the Court.
Appearing on the client’s behalf, Kristina Batkovska made submissions emphasising the client’s youth, limited prior history, future prospects, and the significant long-term consequences a conviction would carry.
After considering the circumstances, the Court dealt with the matter by way of a Conditional Release Order without conviction for 12 months with standard conditions.
As a result, no conviction was recorded, and no disqualification was imposed.
Why this result matters: For young clients, avoiding a criminal conviction can be critical to education, employment, and future opportunities. Early legal advice and careful preparation can make a substantial difference to the final outcome.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Belmont Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with driving with an illicit drug present in oral fluid, blood or urine after police alleged he was stopped for random roadside testing and returned a positive indication for cocaine.
Drug driving offences are treated seriously in New South Wales and can result in fines, licence consequences, and criminal findings. In this matter, the consequences extended well beyond the courtroom. Our client was 19 years old, employed full-time as a security guard working throughout the Newcastle and Hunter region, and relied on holding a valid security licence for his employment.
Under the Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) and associated regulations, a finding of guilt for a drug driving offence can disqualify a person from holding a security licence for 5 years, while a conviction can result in a 10-year disqualification.
The client also had a poor traffic record and was already serving a demerit points suspension at the time of sentence, making the matter particularly challenging. He had, however, no criminal antecedents.
Lamont Law solicitor Kristina Batkovska carefully reviewed the relevant legislation, advised the client about the serious employment consequences of the charge, and prepared submissions emphasising that he would suffer substantial extra-curial punishment through the likely loss of his security licence.
Appearing on the client’s behalf, Kristina Batkovska sought leniency despite the client’s traffic history and highlighted the significant impact any conviction would have on his future employment and livelihood.
After considering the circumstances, the Court dealt with the matter by way of a Conditional Release Order without conviction for 12 months with standard conditions.
As a result, no conviction was recorded, and no licence disqualification was imposed.
Why this result matters: By avoiding a conviction, the impact on the client’s security licence was substantially reduced. This outcome protected his future employment prospects and demonstrated the importance of careful preparation, knowledge of industry-specific consequences, and strong advocacy.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Campbelltown Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with 9 counts of larceny (shoplifting).
Larceny offences are treated seriously by the Courts and each count carries a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment and/or a $5,500 fine in the Local Court. Multiple dishonesty offences can place a person at significant risk of conviction and serious long-term consequences.
Our client was a 20-year-old woman employed as a veterinary nurse with no prior criminal history. She was deeply concerned that criminal convictions would jeopardise both her current employment and future career opportunities.
During consultations with Lamont Law solicitor Jelena Dobric, the client disclosed significant personal issues, including regular use of benzodiazepines and other illicit drugs, including use prior to the offending.
Recognising that rehabilitation was critical, Jelena Dobric assisted the client to access support and treatment.
This preparation included:
- Referral for rehabilitation support
- A letter of instruction to a psychiatrist
- Material for a comprehensive psychiatric report
- Preparation for a potential section 14 mental health application
- Further subjective material for sentence
Although the Court did not ultimately grant the section 14 application, the extensive preparation significantly strengthened the client’s position.
Appearing before Magistrate P Thompson at Campbelltown Local Court, Jelena Dobric made detailed submissions focusing on the client’s youth, lack of record, employment, rehabilitation efforts, and future prospects.
The Court was persuaded to deal with the client under section 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), now known as a Conditional Release Order without conviction.
As a result:
- No criminal convictions were recorded for all 9 charges
- The client protected her career and future employment prospects
- The matter was resolved without a criminal record
Why this result matters: Multiple shoplifting charges often place clients at serious risk of conviction. Early intervention, rehabilitation, and strong advocacy can dramatically change the outcome.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Blacktown Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with stalk or intimidate with intent to cause fear of physical or mental harm (domestic violence related) following an argument at the family home involving her step-mother.
This offence is treated seriously by the Courts and can result in criminal convictions, fines, community-based orders, and significant reputational consequences. Where offending occurs in the family home and in a domestic context, the matter is regarded more seriously.
The allegation involved a verbal threat which had been recorded.
Our client was a hardworking 18-year-old woman with a history of gainful employment despite her young age. She had no prior criminal record and was living in a difficult and challenging home environment at the time.
The client instructed that a plea of guilty should be entered, demonstrating remorse and accepting responsibility for the incident.
Lamont Law solicitor Jelena Dobric carefully prepared the matter for sentence by obtaining:
- Character references
- A letter of apology
- Material addressing the difficult home circumstances
- Evidence of the client’s employment and future prospects
Appearing before Magistrate Van Zuylen at Blacktown Local Court, Jelena Dobric made detailed and persuasive submissions seeking leniency and a non-conviction outcome.
The Court dealt with the matter pursuant to section 10(1)(a) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), meaning the charge was dismissed and no conviction was recorded.
In addition, a final ADVO was made for a reduced period of 12 months, rather than the standard 2 years.
As a result:
- The charge was dismissed
- No criminal conviction was recorded
- The ADVO term was significantly reduced
Why this result matters: Early pleas of guilty, strong subjective material, and careful advocacy can lead to outstanding outcomes even in domestic violence related matters.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Penrith Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm (domestic violence related).
This offence is treated seriously by the Courts and carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment in the District Court, or 2 years imprisonment and/or a $5,500 fine in the Local Court.
Police alleged the offence occurred in the home during an argument between our client and her partner. It was alleged that both parties had been heavily drinking when a dispute arose concerning relationship issues, during which our client bit the complainant on the hand, breaking the skin and drawing blood.
The fact that the offence was alleged to have occurred in a domestic setting was regarded as an aggravating factor.
Our client was a 37-year-old woman with a history of gainful employment who was at risk of losing her job if convicted.
She entered a plea of guilty at the earliest opportunity, demonstrating remorse and allowing the matter to proceed efficiently.
Lamont Law solicitor Jelena Dobric acted quickly to improve the client’s position by:
- Making representations to police to amend the police facts sheet
- Encouraging the client to engage with a mental health professional
- Assisting with rehabilitation steps
- Preparing strong subjective material for sentence
Appearing before Magistrate B van Zuylen at Penrith Local Court, Jelena Dobric made persuasive submissions highlighting the client’s remorse, rehabilitation, employment history, and the disproportionate impact a conviction would have.
The Court dealt with the matter under section 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), now known as a Conditional Release Order without conviction.
In addition, Jelena Dobric successfully negotiated with police for a reduced final ADVO term of 6 months, rather than the standard 2 years.
As a result:
- No criminal conviction was recorded
- The client avoided a criminal record
- The ADVO term was significantly reduced
- Employment prospects were protected
Why this result matters: Domestic violence related offences are serious matters. Early legal advice, rehabilitation steps, and strong advocacy can substantially improve the final outcome.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
@Penrith Local Court
Our client appeared before the Court charged with possession of a prohibited drug, namely 1.63 grams of cocaine.
Possession of cocaine is a serious offence under New South Wales law and carries a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $2,200.
A conviction for a drug offence can have serious consequences for employment, professional registration, travel, and reputation. In this matter, our client was a 50-year-old mother employed by the Department of Education and was deeply concerned about the impact a criminal conviction would have on her career.
The client made full admissions to police and instructed that a plea of guilty should be entered. The plea was entered at the earliest opportunity, entitling the client to full sentencing discount for the plea.
During conferences with Lamont Law solicitor Jelena Dobric, the client disclosed a history of significant personal hardship.
This included:
- Leaving an abusive marriage
- Overcoming alcoholism
- Recovering from breast cancer
- The circumstances in which cocaine use commenced
Jelena Dobric assisted the client in accessing rehabilitation support and prepared extensive subjective material for the Court.
That material included evidence of:
- Prior good character
- Stable employment
- Insight and remorse
- Rehabilitation efforts
- Significant adversity overcome by the client
Appearing before Magistrate Williams at Penrith Local Court, Jelena Dobric made comprehensive submissions seeking that the Court exercise leniency and avoid recording a conviction.
The Court dealt with the matter under section 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), now known as a Conditional Release Order without conviction.
As a result:
- No criminal conviction was recorded
- The client protected her employment and future prospects
- The matter was resolved without the burden of a criminal record
Why this result matters: Even where guilt is admitted, strong subjective preparation and evidence of hardship, rehabilitation, and good character can lead to a no-conviction outcome.
This case result was dependent on its own facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Call A Lawyer Now
High Success Rate
Legal Experts
Free Consult • Confidential • Fixed Fees
Request a Call
